Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing artificial intelligence in the Google Advertising service

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

ORCID

item.page.thesis.degree.name

item.page.thesis.degree.level

item.page.thesis.degree.discipline

item.page.thesis.degree.department

item.page.thesis.degree.grantor

item.page.thesis.degree.advisor

item.page.thesis.degree.committeeMember

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Univrsity Of Tehran Press

Abstract

This paper examines the effectiveness of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in the Google Ads advertising service. The study analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of AI integration, focusing on attribution models and end-to-end analytics. The findings show that traditional metrics, such as CTR, CPC, and ROI, used to evaluate advertising campaign performance, exhibit significant statistical errors when AI tools are applied, with errors reaching up to 35%, exceeding typical business margins. A comparative analysis in the construction industry highlights discrepancies of 10% to 35% between traditional and AIdriven models. The study concludes that universal AI algorithms often fail to account for industry-specific dynamics, leading to inaccurate evaluations. The practical significance of this research lies in proposing an alternative approach that combines traditional evaluation methods with AI-based tools, offering a more reliable framework for assessing campaign effectiveness.

Description

Citation

Chukurna О., Tardaskina T., Tereshko Yu. V., Kholostenko E., Kofman V., Pankovets L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing artificial intelligence in the Google Advertising service. Journal of Information Technology Management. 2024. Vol. 16, Issue 4. Р. 79-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2024.99052
Chukurna, О. , Tardaskina, T. , Tereshko, Y. , Kholostenko, E. , Kofman, V. and Pankovets, L. (2024). Evaluation of the effectiveness of implementing artificial intelligence in the Google Advertising service. Journal of Information Technology Management, 16(4), 79-99. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2024.99052

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By